Archives for 2026

A Window Into a Lost Snohomish County Resort

Garland Mineral Springs was never just a roadside stop or a forgotten mountain retreat. These four surviving brochures show Garland at different moments in its life: first as a health-and-pleasure mineral springs resort, then as a Christian vacation retreat, and finally as the home of a children’s dude ranch in the heart of the Cascades.

Taken together, the brochures preserve a rare record of recreation, faith, health tourism, mountain travel, and family vacation life in Snohomish County during the 1940s and 1950s. They also help explain why Garland matters today. The resort sat fourteen miles northeast of Index, Washington, along the North Fork of the Skykomish River, in a place where mineral water, mountain trails, old-growth timber, fishing, horseback riding, and the Great Northern Railway all came together.

These brochures are more than advertisements. They are pieces of Washington State history.

1. Garland Famous Mineral Springs — Health and Pleasure, circa 1940

The earliest brochure in this group presents Garland as “Garland Famous Mineral Springs” and promotes it as a place of “Health and Pleasure.” This version of Garland was still very much in the tradition of early 20th-century mineral springs resorts, where visitors traveled for rest, recreation, bathing, drinking mineral water, and the promise of renewed health.

The brochure describes Garland as being located on the North Fork of the Skykomish River, fourteen miles northeast of Index, with access by automobile, motor coach, and the Great Northern Railway. It emphasizes the resort’s mountain setting, cool summer climate, virgin timber, native flowers, mountain streams, and surrounding peaks.

The 1940 brochure is especially valuable because it documents Garland as a fully developed destination before the Sharpe and Mooney years. It lists a 22-room hotel, dining room, cabins, campground, store, hot mineral baths, sitz baths, massage rooms, treatments, and a large outdoor swimming pool filled with heated carbonated mineral water. It also includes a printed “Analysis of Garland Mineral Springs” by the University of Washington from 1932, showing that the mineral water itself was central to the resort’s identity.

Historically, this brochure places Garland within a broader Washington State pattern: the development of mountain resorts promoted through railroads, highways, health claims, and outdoor recreation. It also shows how Snohomish County’s eastern mountain communities were once marketed not just as logging or mining country, but as places of health, beauty, tourism, and adventure.

Download PDF

2. Garland Mineral Springs — Right in the Heart of the Cascades, 1953

The 1953 bifold brochure marks a major change in Garland’s story. The resort is still promoted as a mountain vacation destination, but the tone has shifted. Garland is now presented as a wholesome Christian retreat, dedicated to rest, health, fellowship, and spiritual renewal.

This brochure features the words “Right in the Heart of the Cascades” and describes Garland as “A Delightful Health Building Vacation Spot.” It still promotes the warm mineral-water swimming pool, fishing for steelhead in the Skykomish River, hiking trails, children’s play areas, the lodge, dining room, store, and cabins. But it also includes Bible study, Sunday afternoon services, Christian fellowship, singtime, and firesides.

One of the most important features of this brochure is the personal statement from Cameron Sharpe. He explains that Garland’s forty acres had been dedicated to God’s use and that visitors were invited to find “rest, health and a personal knowledge of our Lord.” That statement gives the brochure deep family and historical significance. It is not just a resort advertisement; it is a declaration of purpose from the people who carried Garland into its Christian retreat era.

For Snohomish County history, this brochure captures a moment when Garland was part of a regional tradition of church camps, youth retreats, and mountain vacation ministries. It also shows the transition from the older commercial mineral springs model into a faith-based family retreat rooted in the same landscape, waters, and buildings.

Download PDF

3. Garland Mineral Springs — The Christian Resort, 1953

The 1953 trifold brochure is one of the clearest statements of Garland’s identity during the Sharpe and Mooney years. Its cover reads “Garland Mineral Springs — The Christian Resort” and presents the resort as “An Inspiring Vacation Spot in the Heart of the Cascades.”

The history panel describes the green garland as a symbol of victory and beauty, and connects the resort’s name with the idea of spiritual living. It tells visitors that Indigenous people had gathered at the springs for health before white settlement, and that later visitors came to drink the water and bathe in the pools. It also repeats the theme of Garland as a place of tall trees, mountain streams, waterfalls, wildlife, trails, Lake Blanca, and Columbia Glacier.

This brochure gives a more complete picture of Garland as a working family resort. It describes a lodge with 22 bedrooms, a living room, dining room, recreation room, store, and coffee shop. It lists 20 furnished cottages, mineral water for drinking, bathing, and swimming, children’s play areas, Sunday services, informal singtimes and firesides, and a children’s “Dude Ranch” for ages 8 to 16.

Its historic importance is that it captures Garland as a complete mountain community. It was not simply a lodge beside a spring. It had cabins, horses, trails, dining, swimming, Sunday services, children’s programs, and a social life. In the broader story of Washington State, this brochure helps document a now-vanished style of Cascade vacationing: families traveling by road, rail, or bus to a self-contained mountain resort where recreation, faith, and the natural landscape were woven together.

Download PDF

4. Troublesome Trail Dude Ranch — A Rare Surviving Children’s Brochure

The most unusual brochure in this collection is the Troublesome Trail Dude Ranch brochure. This appears to be the only known copy, and to my knowledge it has never before been published on the internet. That makes it especially important.

The brochure promotes the “Troublesome Trail Dude Ranch” at Garland Mineral Springs as a program for boys and girls ages 8 to 16. It describes horsemanship, horse shows, swimming instruction, water carnivals, hiking, nature studies, fishing, singtimes, campfires, badminton, croquet, horseshoes, and volleyball. It presents the Double T Dude Ranch as being operated in conjunction with the Christian resort at Garland.

The inside text explains that three bunkhouses had been renovated for the young ranchers, along with a corral room for fun and fellowship. Meals were served family-style in the lodge dining room, with some meals outdoors in picnic and camp style. The brochure emphasizes carefully selected horses, horseback trips through scenic forest and mountain terrain, and swimming in Garland’s 105-foot warm mineral-water pool under the supervision of a Red Cross lifesaving instructor.

The brochure also gives a rare glimpse into mid-century children’s recreation in rural Washington. The packing list includes jeans, shirts, warm jackets, comfortable shoes, towels, a Bible “if desired,” a health certificate signed by a doctor, and a limited amount of spending money. It also explains arrival and departure procedures, including meeting children at Index by arrangement.

This brochure is historically significant because it documents a short-lived and very specific chapter of Garland’s story: the attempt to create a supervised Christian dude ranch experience for children in the Cascades. It connects Garland to the broader postwar growth of youth camps, outdoor education, horseback programs, and family-centered Christian recreation. It also preserves names, activities, rates, rules, and daily-life details that might otherwise be lost completely.

Download PDF

Why These Brochures Matter

For Snohomish County, these brochures are evidence that Garland Mineral Springs was once an important mountain destination. They show a resort that drew visitors from Seattle, Everett, Wenatchee, and beyond. They show the importance of Index as a gateway to the upper Skykomish country. They show how the North Fork Skykomish, Lake Blanca, Columbia Glacier, Ruby Creek, and surrounding trails were part of the region’s recreation identity long before modern outdoor tourism became mainstream.

For Washington State history, the brochures connect several larger stories:

• Mineral springs and health tourism: Garland belonged to a once-popular tradition of resorts built around mineral water, bathing, and natural healing.
• Railroad and highway tourism: The brochures promoted access by the Great Northern Railway, motor coach, and automobile, showing how transportation shaped early Cascade tourism.
• Faith-based recreation: The 1953 brochures show Garland’s transformation into a Christian resort centered on fellowship, worship, family life, and spiritual renewal.
• Youth outdoor programs: The Troublesome Trail brochure documents a children’s dude ranch program that combined horses, swimming, nature study, campfires, and Christian character-building.
• Lost resort culture: The brochures preserve images and descriptions of the lodge, pool, cabins, store, dining room, bath department, trails, and daily activities that no longer exist in the same form today.

They also matter because Garland itself has been changed by fire, flood, river movement, abandonment, and time. The 1961 lodge fire, decades of river change, and the 2025 flood have made these paper records even more important. In some cases, the brochures preserve the only surviving view of buildings, programs, and experiences that are now gone.

A Record Worth Preserving

Publishing these brochures is part of the larger effort to recover and preserve the lost history of Garland Mineral Springs. Each brochure adds a piece to the story. The 1940 brochure shows the developed mineral springs resort. The 1953 bifold shows the personal vision of Cameron Sharpe and the Christian retreat era. The 1953 trifold shows Garland as a complete family vacation destination. The Troublesome Trail brochure reveals a rare children’s dude ranch program that might otherwise disappear from memory.

Together, they show that Garland was more than a private resort. It was part of the cultural, recreational, spiritual, and environmental history of Snohomish County and Washington State.

These brochures deserve to be seen, studied, and preserved. —Stephen

In 2025, a catastrophic flood risked changing Garland Mineral Springs forever.

When the U.S. Forest Service bridge above Garland failed, the North Fork Skykomish River surged across the property. The river swept away the remaining historic cabins, stripped away topsoil, uprooted hundreds of trees, and engulfed both the mineral springs and geothermal wellheads that make Garland unique.

Today, the river is flowing where families once gathered, children played, campers explored, and visitors soaked in the mineral waters that made Garland famous.

For many people, the obvious question is simple:

Is there anything that can be done, or are the Mineral Springs simply lost?”

That question has occupied much of my thinking since visiting Garland this spring when I observed the impact first-hand.

Like many people who care about Garland, I assumed that once a river changes course, there may be little that can be done. But before accepting that conclusion, I wanted to know whether other mineral springs around the United States had faced similar threats—and whether anyone had successfully intervened to protect them.

What I discovered surprised me.

Across the country, historic mineral springs, hot springs, spring-fed waterways, and culturally significant water resources have repeatedly received public support, technical assistance, conservation funding, and restoration planning when they were threatened by flooding, erosion, development, or environmental degradation.

Garland may not be the only spring worth saving.

But it would not be the first.

1. Warm Mineral Springs, Florida

   Warm Mineral Springs near North Port, Florida, is one of the most significant mineral springs in the United States. Known for its unique mineral-rich waters and archaeological importance, the spring has attracted visitors for generations.

   When erosion, sedimentation, habitat degradation, and storm impacts threatened the spring-fed ecosystem, a coalition of organizations came together to restore and protect the resource.

   The project included creek restoration, sediment removal, habitat enhancement, and bank stabilization designed to preserve the spring environment.

   Partners included:

   • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
   • Sarasota County
   • The Nature Conservancy
   • National Wildlife Federation
   • City of North Port
   • Coastal & Heartland National Estuary Partnership
   • Gulf Coast Community Foundation

   Why it matters: Public agencies and conservation organizations invested significant resources because they viewed the spring as a unique natural, recreational, and cultural asset worthy of protection.

2. Tahama Spring, Colorado

   Tahama Spring near Colorado Springs suffered extensive damage during major flooding events in the early twentieth century.

   Following the devastating flood of 1935, government agencies stepped in to protect the spring and surrounding area. Improvements included widening stream channels, raising banks, restoring damaged infrastructure, and reducing future flood risks.

   Partners included:

   • Works Progress Administration (WPA)
   • City of Colorado Springs
   • Local preservation organizations

   Why it matters: This is a direct example of public investment to protect a historic spring resource threatened by flooding and river movement.

3. Warm Springs Creek, Idaho

   In Idaho, floodplain instability and streambank erosion threatened portions of Warm Springs Creek and the surrounding spring-fed ecosystem.

   Restoration efforts focused on long-term watershed health rather than simply hardening the riverbanks. Engineers and restoration specialists used floodplain restoration, habitat enhancement, channel improvements, and natural stabilization techniques.

   Many modern projects now rely on engineered log structures, large woody debris, and natural channel design rather than traditional riprap alone.

   Why it matters: These projects demonstrate that river restoration and resource protection can often work together, even in environmentally sensitive watersheds.

4. Peoria Mineral Springs, Illinois

   Peoria Mineral Springs faced a different threat—not flooding, but abandonment and eventual disappearance.

   Once a popular destination, the spring was eventually buried and forgotten. Through the efforts of local advocates and preservation-minded citizens, the spring was rediscovered, excavated, restored, and preserved.

   Partners included:

   • Private landowners
   • Historic preservation advocates
   • Local government supporters

   Why it matters: This example demonstrates that even privately owned mineral springs can be recognized as resources with broader historical and cultural value.

5. Warm Mineral Springs Park Preservation, Florida

   Another example comes from Florida, where public agencies worked to preserve Warm Mineral Springs through acquisition, conservation planning, and long-term stewardship efforts.

   Rather than waiting until the resource was lost, agencies took proactive steps to ensure the spring would remain protected for future generations.

   Partners included:

   • Sarasota County
   • City of North Port
   • Conservation Foundation of the Gulf Coast

   Why it matters: The spring was viewed as more than a local attraction—it was recognized as an environmental, historical, educational, and recreational asset.

What These Projects Have in Common

Although each project was different, the reasons these resources were protected were remarkably similar.

• Historic preservation
• Protection of unique natural resources
• Recreation and tourism value
• Ecological restoration
• Educational opportunities
• Community heritage
• Flood mitigation and channel stabilization
• Public-private partnerships

These projects were not funded because they generated profits.

They were funded because communities, agencies, and conservation organizations determined the resources were valuable enough to preserve.

What Makes Garland Different?

The more I researched these projects, the more I realized that Garland possesses an unusual combination of characteristics rarely found together in a single location.

• Historic mineral springs
• High-mineral-content therapeutic waters
• Naturally carbonated "sparkling/soda" spring water
• A 1930s resort history
• A youth camp and retreat history dating to the 1950s
• Location on one of Washington's most important salmon rivers
• Documented flood damage and ongoing river migration
• Educational and scientific value

Most preservation projects can point to one or two of these factors.

Garland has all of them.

The strongest argument for Garland may not be protecting private property.

The stronger argument may be preserving a unique natural, historical, geological, and cultural resource before it is permanently lost.

Could Garland Receive Similar Consideration?

I don't know the answer.

What I do know is that other communities have successfully protected springs, spring-fed ecosystems, and historic water resources when they were threatened.

Perhaps Garland deserves at least the same evaluation.

Potential organizations that may have relevant expertise include:

• USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
• Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office
• Washington Salmon Recovery Funding Board
• National Trust for Historic Preservation
• Conservation foundations
• Universities and geological research programs
• River restoration specialists

Do You Care?

Over the past year I have spoken with former visitors, historians, geologists, elected officials, family members, and people who simply remember Garland from decades ago.

Nearly all of them agree on one thing:

Garland Mineral Springs is worth remembering.

But remembering Garland and saving Garland are two very different things.

Today the springs are being impacted by river migration. The geothermal wells are at risk. The historic resort structures are gone. The landscape continues to change with every flood season.

The question is no longer what Garland once was.

The question is whether anything can still be done to preserve what remains.

If you have expertise in river restoration, hydrology, geology, geothermal resources, fisheries, historic preservation, environmental permitting, conservation funding, or grant writing, I would love to hear from you.

If you know someone at a university, government agency, engineering firm, nonprofit organization, or foundation who may be interested in evaluating the site, please reach out.

If you visited Garland, attended camp there, worked there, or have photographs, documents, maps, or stories to share, your contribution could help preserve an important piece of Washington history.

Most importantly, if you believe Garland Mineral Springs deserves a fair evaluation before it is permanently lost, let me know.

I am actively seeking ideas, contacts, expertise, and potential partners.

The goal is simple:

Determine whether this unique mineral spring resource can still be protected for future generations.

If this story resonates with you, please leave a comment, share this article, or contact me directly through the website.

Do you care? I'd genuinely like to hear from you.

Imagine standing beside the North Fork Skykomish River where mineral water once drew travelers deep into the Cascades. The air is cold, the forest is quiet, and beneath the damaged ground are springs that gave this place its purpose long before cabins, roads, or resort buildings were built.

That is Garland Mineral Springs.

Today, Garland is private property. I want to be clear about that from the beginning. But Garland is also more than private land. It is a historic mineral springs site, a damaged river corridor, a former mountain resort, a former youth camp, and a rare natural water resource with a story that reaches back to the Starr Hot Springs era of the 1880s and 1890s.

The question we are asking is simple:

Can restoring Garland provide a public benefit?

I believe the answer may be yes — not because the public should subsidize private development, but because Garland may offer public value through watershed recovery, historic preservation, conservation, education, outdoor recreation, and protection of a rare mineral springs resource.

Key Takeaways

• Garland is privately owned, but private ownership does not automatically mean there is no public benefit.
• The springs are the historic resource. The resort, cabins, pool, and camp existed because people valued the mineral waters.
• The 2025 flood created more than private damage. It changed the river corridor, threatened the spring area, and damaged a historic landscape.
• Public-private partnerships are common when private land has historic, environmental, recreational, or watershed value.
• Garland may qualify for several kinds of review or support, including emergency watershed assistance, historic preservation research, conservation partnerships, and heritage interpretation.
• The long-term vision is not a large resort. A more appropriate future may be a small, historically grounded, environmentally responsible campground and educational site.

Why We Are Asking for Help to Restore Garland Mineral Springs

Garland Mineral Springs is private property. I want to be clear about that from the beginning.

But Garland is not just another piece of private land tucked away in the Cascade Mountains. For nearly a century, it has been part of Washington’s mountain history. It was once a mineral springs resort, a family retreat, a youth camp, and a place where generations came to experience healing waters in the forest above Index, Washington.

Today, Garland is in trouble.

The North Fork Skykomish River has changed the property in a way that is difficult to fully explain unless you have stood there and seen it. The 2025 flood event swept away the remaining cabins, tore through the riverbank, removed trees and topsoil, and pushed the river across areas that once held the mineral springs, old camp structures, and geothermal well sites.

What was once a historic mineral springs property is now also a damaged river corridor, a flood recovery site, and a fragile piece of local history at risk of being lost forever.

That is why we are exploring whether Garland may qualify for public-private partnership, emergency watershed assistance, historic preservation support, conservation tools, or heritage funding.

This is not about asking taxpayers to simply improve private property. It is about asking whether a historically significant and environmentally damaged site may deserve help because it carries public value beyond the boundaries of ownership.

What Public Benefit Could Mean at Garland

When people hear the phrase “public benefit,” they may think only of public ownership, tax revenue, or a public park. But public benefit can be broader than that.

At Garland, public benefit could mean:

• Watershed protection: understanding and addressing flood damage along the North Fork Skykomish River corridor.
• Historic preservation: documenting the Starr Hot Springs era, the Garland resort years, and the Sharpe family camp history.
• Mineral springs protection: preserving a rare natural water resource that gave the property its historic identity.
• Conservation: protecting riverbank, forest, habitat, and floodplain values in a sensitive mountain valley.
• Education: teaching future visitors about geology, mineral water, geothermal exploration, floods, and Cascade history.
• Outdoor recreation: supporting hikers, campers, anglers, and visitors already drawn to the upper North Fork Skykomish region.
• Community memory: preserving a place where generations came for healing, retreat, worship, family, and time in the mountains.

Garland does not need to become public land in order to serve a public purpose. The question is whether the property can be protected, interpreted, and carefully used in a way that benefits more than the owners alone.

Public Investment in Private Property Is Not Unusual When There Is Public Benefit

At first glance, some people may ask: “Why should public agencies help with private land?”

That is a fair question.

But there is a long history in America of public funds being used on private land when the public receives something meaningful in return. That public benefit can include historic preservation, watershed protection, flood mitigation, conservation, public access, cultural interpretation, or protection of important natural resources.

In many cases, the public does not buy the property outright. Instead, support may come through grants, easements, partnerships, emergency stabilization work, nonprofit sponsorship, or preservation agreements.

That is the kind of path we are trying to understand for Garland Mineral Springs.

1. Emergency Watershed Protection and Flood Recovery

The most urgent issue at Garland is the river.

The 2025 flood did not simply damage a few old buildings. It changed the landscape. The river scoured the property, removed soil and trees, destroyed the remaining cabins, and pushed into areas where the mineral springs and geothermal well heads are located.

This raises questions that go beyond private ownership:

• Is the altered river channel creating an ongoing hazard?
• Could future flooding carry more debris downstream?
• Is erosion threatening the mineral springs, geothermal wells, or nearby public lands?
• Could stabilization help protect the broader watershed?
• Is there a role for Snohomish County, a conservation district, or another public sponsor?

Programs such as the USDA NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection Program are designed to help communities recover after floods and other natural disasters. These programs often require a local public sponsor, such as a county, conservation district, city, or tribe. That means Garland may not be able to apply alone, but it may be eligible to be part of a sponsored recovery effort if the damage creates a broader public concern.

Why Garland might qualify: the damage is not cosmetic. It is river damage, watershed damage, and flood-channel damage. If restoring stability at Garland helps protect the North Fork Skykomish River corridor, downstream resources, public infrastructure, or nearby lands, then there may be a legitimate public interest in helping.

2. Historic Preservation Support: The Springs Are the Historic Resource

Garland Mineral Springs has a story worth preserving, but that story does not begin with the cabins, the lodge, or the old resort buildings. It begins with the springs themselves.

The reason people came to this remote mountain location was the mineral water. Long before my family became involved, and long before the Garland resort buildings were constructed, these waters were already known as something rare in the North Fork Skykomish River valley.

One of the most important early accounts comes from Carrie Starr Weismann, who wrote in 1928 about her experience at what was then known as the Starr Hot Springs near Index, Washington. According to her account, Dr. J. N. Starr first learned of the springs in 1889 after hearing from an Englishman who had been in the woods near what is now Index. The man described springs so charged with gas that a bottle would not hold the water, and he compared them favorably to the waters at Baden-Baden, Germany.

Dr. Starr then traveled by pack train into the North Fork Skykomish River valley to find the springs. After locating them, he built cabins and prepared the site so Carrie Starr could be brought in by horseback over the rough mountain trail from Sultan and Index. Carrie later wrote that after bathing in the spring waters daily, the swelling in her knee disappeared, and she credited the waters with her recovery.

Whether a modern reader views that account as medical testimony, personal memoir, or frontier-era belief in mineral-water healing, it is historically valuable. It shows that the springs were not an afterthought. They were the reason people endured difficult travel into the mountains. They were the reason cabins were first built. They were the reason the land was claimed, titled, visited, and remembered.

Dr. Starr and Carrie Starr eventually secured title to the land where the springs were located. Carrie wrote that the grant was signed by President Grover Cleveland in May 1896. That connection gives the springs a documented history reaching back to the late 1800s, before the property became widely known as Garland Mineral Springs.

That is an important distinction. Garland is not simply a former resort site with some old buildings that happened to be near water. Garland is a historic mineral springs site. The buildings were evidence of the public’s interest in the springs, but the springs are the original historic resource.

In the 1930s, the site was developed further as a mineral springs resort because people continued to believe the waters had therapeutic and restorative value. Visitors traveled into the Cascades to experience the springs, the mountain air, the river, and the quiet forest setting. Cabins, a lodge, stables, and a pool were added because the springs gave the place its purpose.

In 1953, Rev. Cameron Sharpe and Laura Mae Mooney purchased Garland and continued its public-facing role as a youth camp, church retreat, and family gathering place. But even then, the identity of the property remained tied to the mineral springs. The water was what made Garland different from any other mountain camp or private retreat.

Much of the physical history is now gone. The lodge burned decades ago. The remaining cabins survived for years but were swept away in the 2025 flood. But the loss of the buildings does not erase Garland’s historic value. The springs remain the heart of the story.

What remains today is the land, the mineral spring source, the historic water records, the geothermal exploration history, old photographs, maps, surveys, family memories, and the continuing question of whether this rare mineral water resource can be protected before it is lost to the river.

Why Garland might qualify: historic preservation is not only about saving old buildings. It can also include protecting and documenting historic landscapes, natural features with cultural significance, mineral springs, archaeological resources, historic water sites, and places where people gathered because of a unique natural resource.

Garland may be a candidate for historic research, mineral springs documentation, archival preservation, interpretive signage, oral history collection, National Register evaluation, cultural landscape study, or partnership with a heritage nonprofit.

The case for Garland is simple: the buildings were temporary, but the springs are the reason Garland existed. From the Starr Hot Springs era of the 1880s and 1890s, through the Garland resort period, through the Sharpe family camp years, the mineral waters have been the constant. If there is a historic resource worth preserving, it is the springs themselves and the nearly century-and-a-half human story that grew around them.

3. Washington Heritage and Cultural Landscape Funding

Washington State has programs that support heritage projects, historic landscapes, museums, archives, and cultural interpretation. These programs often work best when a nonprofit, public agency, tribe, or heritage organization is involved.

That may be an important lesson for Garland.

If Garland remains simply a private LLC asking for direct help, the path may be difficult. But if Garland partners with a qualified nonprofit, historical society, university, public agency, or preservation organization, the public benefit becomes easier to define.

A heritage project at Garland could include:

• A formal history of the mineral springs resort
• Research and interpretation of the Starr Hot Springs era
• Digitizing and preserving old photographs, maps, letters, and surveys
• Creating an online archive for the public
• Documenting the 2025 flood damage
• Interpreting the mineral water and geothermal history
• Developing educational materials about the North Fork Skykomish River corridor
• Creating future signage or guided public access if the site becomes safe

Why Garland might qualify: Garland is not just land. It is a historic mountain mineral springs site tied to recreation, natural water, family history, faith communities, and the development of the upper Skykomish region. Even if the property remains privately owned, the history belongs to a wider public story.

4. Conservation Easements and River Corridor Protection

Another possible path is conservation.

Garland sits in a sensitive and beautiful part of the Cascades, near the Wild Sky Wilderness region and along the North Fork Skykomish River corridor. The flood damage has shown how powerful and dynamic this river system can be.

A conservation easement or preservation agreement could allow the family to retain ownership while permanently protecting certain public values. Those values might include habitat, floodplain function, river corridor protection, historic interpretation, or limited future public access.

This kind of arrangement is common across the country. Public funds or nonprofit funds are often used to protect private land when the land has conservation, habitat, scenic, recreational, agricultural, or historic value.

Why Garland might qualify: the property is not being proposed for ordinary private development. The more responsible question is whether Garland can be stabilized and protected in a way that respects the river, preserves the mineral springs, and creates a lasting public benefit.

5. Public Access, Education, Interpretation, and Future Outdoor Recreation

One of the strongest justifications for public support is to create public benefit.

That does not necessarily mean opening the property freely to the public tomorrow. At this point, the site may not be safe for general access. The first priorities would be protecting the springs, understanding the river damage, and determining whether the North Fork Skykomish River can be stabilized or reestablished away from the most vulnerable parts of the property.

But public benefit can take many forms, and Garland’s location gives it unusual potential.

Garland sits in a mountain recreation corridor where people already come to camp, hike, fish, explore the North Fork Skykomish River, and access nearby alpine country. Just below Garland, the U.S. Forest Service operates Troublesome Creek Campground, a 25-site campground located along the North Fork Skykomish River and Troublesome Creek. The Forest Service also lists San Juan Campground nearby, a small 8-site campground that offers access to the North Fork Skykomish River area.

That matters because it shows that small-scale camping is already part of the public recreation pattern in this valley. Garland’s future does not have to be a large commercial development. A more appropriate vision may be a modest, carefully planned private campground that supports the same kind of outdoor recreation people already seek in this area.

If the springs can be protected, the damaged river corridor stabilized, and the site made safe, Garland could someday provide a limited number of camping sites in a historic setting. A future version of Garland might include a small number of trailer sites, walk-in tent sites, educational displays, spring-history interpretation, and low-impact access for hikers and visitors exploring the upper North Fork Skykomish corridor.

That kind of future would not erase Garland’s history. It would continue it.

Garland began as a place people traveled to because of the mineral waters. It later became a resort, a youth camp, and a family retreat. A carefully designed campground could become the next chapter: a place where visitors learn the history of the springs, understand the power of the river, and use Garland as a respectful basecamp for exploring the surrounding public lands.

A future Garland might include:

• A limited number of trailer or small RV sites
• Walk-in tent sites
• Educational signs about the mineral springs and Starr Hot Springs history
• Flood interpretation showing how the river changed the property
• Trailhead-style support for hikers exploring the upper North Fork Skykomish region
• Long-term study of whether geothermal resources could responsibly support limited on-site energy needs

This is only a vision. It would require engineering, environmental review, family agreement, agency coordination, and careful planning. But it shows why Garland’s restoration could serve a broader public purpose. A protected Garland could become a basecamp for history, geology, river recovery, and outdoor recreation — not just a private property hidden behind a gate.

For Garland, possible public benefits could include:

• Online access to historic photos, maps, letters, and documents
• A public history of the Starr Hot Springs, Garland resort, and Sharpe family camp eras
• Educational material about mineral springs and geothermal exploration
• Flood documentation showing how the river changed the property
• Partnership with local schools, historians, recreation groups, or conservation organizations
• Future guided access if the property can be made safe
• Interpretive signage or a public-facing restoration journal
• A small, low-impact private campground that complements nearby Forest Service recreation
• Future trailhead-style support for hikers exploring the upper North Fork Skykomish and nearby alpine destinations such as Blanca Lake

Why Garland might qualify: the public does not have to own Garland for the public to benefit from preserving Garland’s story. If the site becomes a case study in historic preservation, flood recovery, mineral water protection, watershed restoration, and low-impact outdoor recreation, then the public value is real.

The goal would not be to turn Garland into a high-density resort. The more appropriate vision is a small, historically grounded, environmentally responsible campground that protects the springs, respects the river, and gives future visitors a reason to care about this place.

6. Geothermal and Mineral Water Resource Protection

Garland is also unusual because of its mineral water and geothermal history.

The property contains mineral springs and was the site of geothermal exploration. A deep geothermal test well was drilled in 2011, and the site has long been associated with mineral-rich waters rising from below the mountain landscape.

The current question is whether a smaller, protected well could reach the mineral spring pool underground and provide a clean, stable source of mineral water. That idea is at the heart of the Restore Garland Campaign.

We are not presenting that as a final engineering plan. We are asking whether it is worth studying, estimating, and discussing with qualified professionals.

Why Garland might qualify: natural mineral springs are rare resources. Garland’s water, geothermal history, and cultural history are connected. Protecting the spring source may preserve both a natural resource and a historic identity.

Addressing the Fair Question: Why Should Public Agencies Care?

It is fair for anyone to ask why a privately owned property should receive public attention, public support, or public agency review.

My answer is that Garland should not receive help simply because it is private land that was damaged. It should receive serious consideration only if restoration creates benefits beyond the owners.

That is the standard we are trying to meet.

If Garland’s restoration only improved a private asset, then the public case would be weak. But if restoration protects a historic mineral springs site, stabilizes a damaged river corridor, preserves a rare water resource, creates public education, supports responsible recreation, and helps tell the story of the upper North Fork Skykomish valley, then the public benefit becomes much stronger.

The better question is not whether Garland is private. The better question is whether Garland can be restored in a way that serves a broader public purpose.

Why This Matters to Me

My connection to Garland is personal.

My father’s family became part of Garland’s story in the 1950s. I inherited my father’s share, and I now feel a responsibility to help decide whether Garland is simply allowed to disappear or whether we make a serious effort to preserve what remains.

I do not believe Garland can be restored to exactly what it once was. The old resort is gone. The cabins are gone. The river has changed the land.

But I do believe Garland can still have a future.

That future may not look like the past. It may be a protected spring source. It may be a documented historic site. It may be a conservation partnership. It may be an educational project. It may be a small restoration campaign that gives people a chance to help preserve a place that would otherwise be forgotten.

What We Are Asking For

We are asking public agencies, conservation groups, historians, preservation organizations, family members, and supporters to help us answer a few important questions:

• Can Garland qualify for emergency watershed assistance?
• Can the flood damage be evaluated as part of a broader river recovery effort?
• Can Garland’s history be formally documented and preserved?
• Can a nonprofit or public agency partnership help create public benefit?
• Can conservation tools protect the river corridor and mineral spring site?
• Can a clean, protected mineral water source be responsibly explored?
• Can the public help save the story of Garland before it is lost?

This Is Not Just About Private Land

Garland Mineral Springs is privately owned. But its story reaches beyond ownership.

It is part of the history of Index, the North Fork Skykomish River, mountain recreation, mineral springs, family camps, faith retreats, and the changing relationship between people and wild places in Washington’s Cascades.

The 2025 flood did not just damage a family property. It damaged a historic place, a river corridor, and a living record of nearly a century of mountain history.

That is why we are seeking solutions.

We are not asking anyone to subsidize a private development. We are asking whether a public-private partnership is appropriate to protect a damaged historic mineral springs site, stabilize a flood-altered river corridor, document a nearly century-old public heritage resource, and preserve options for future public interpretation.

If Garland can be saved, even in a new and different form, it will take more than one family. It will take public interest, careful planning, qualified partners, and people who believe that some places are worth remembering.

That is the purpose of the Restore Garland Campaign.

How You Can Help

The Restore Garland Campaign is still in its early stages. Right now, we are asking questions, gathering history, documenting damage, seeking qualified partners, and trying to understand what kind of restoration is possible.

If you believe Garland Mineral Springs is worth saving, here are a few ways to help:

• Share this post with people who care about Washington history, mineral springs, river restoration, and the North Fork Skykomish valley.
• Send us historical materials if you have photos, postcards, letters, maps, or memories connected to Garland, Starr Hot Springs, Index, Galena, or the upper Skykomish region.
• Help us find partners in historic preservation, watershed recovery, conservation, geology, recreation planning, or public-private restoration projects.
• Encourage public agencies to take a serious look at whether Garland fits emergency watershed, heritage, conservation, or recreation-related support programs.
• Follow the Restore Garland Campaign as we document the history, the flood damage, and the possibility of a future for the springs.

Garland may never return to what it once was. But with the right partners, it may still become something meaningful: a protected mineral springs site, a restored river corridor, a place of public learning, and a small gateway to one of Washington’s most beautiful mountain valleys.

We are beginning the work of asking questions, seeking partners, documenting the damage, preserving the history, and exploring whether Garland Mineral Springs still has a future.

And we hope you will follow the journey. —Stephen

Sources and Further Reading

• USDA NRCS Emergency Watershed Protection Program
• National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund Grant Programs
• Washington State Historical Society Heritage Capital Projects
• U.S. Forest Service: Troublesome Creek Campground
• U.S. Forest Service: San Juan Campground
• Carrie Starr Weismann, “The Story of My Infirmity and the Permanent Cure by the use of the Waters of the Starr Hot Springs, near Index, Washington,” 1928

There are moments when a place becomes more than land on a map. For our family, Garland Mineral Springs has always been one of those places. Tucked deep in the North Fork Skykomish River Valley near Index, Washington, Garland was once a mountain resort, a youth camp, a family retreat, and a place where generations gathered around mineral water, cabins, forest trails, and the sound of the river.

For nearly a century, Garland has carried stories. Stories of travelers who came seeking healing waters. Stories of families who spent summers beside the mineral pool. Stories of cabins, campfires, mountain air, and the powerful beauty of the Cascades.

But after the catastrophic flooding of late 2025, Garland is now carrying a different story.

When the River Changed Course

During the December 2025 atmospheric river and flooding events, the North Fork Skykomish River changed the landscape around Garland Mineral Springs in ways that are difficult to describe without seeing them firsthand.

The flood destroyed the remaining historic cabins. It stripped away topsoil, swept out mature trees, altered river channels, and pushed active water across areas that had once been stable ground. Places that had held cabins and memories for decades were transformed into active or former riverbed.

Most concerning of all, the river now threatens the defining natural resource of Garland: the geothermal mineral springs themselves.

The springs are not simply a feature on the property. They are the reason Garland existed. They are the reason the resort was built in the 1930s. They are the reason families kept returning. They are the historic, geologic, and cultural heart of Garland Mineral Springs.

Today, active erosion and channel migration continue to threaten the mineral spring area and the geothermal well infrastructure on the property. Without stabilization, documentation, and assistance, there is a real concern that portions of this historic natural resource could be permanently damaged or lost.

Why We Are Writing Letters

When a disaster affects a private property, it can be difficult to know where to begin. Garland is privately owned, but the damage touches much larger questions: watershed stability, access to public and private lands, historic preservation, emergency recovery, transportation corridors, river migration, and protection of a rare geothermal resource in the western Cascades.

No single agency owns all of those issues. No single office has all of the answers.

That is why we have begun reaching out.

We have prepared letters to county, state, and federal offices asking for guidance, evaluation, coordination, and assistance. These letters are not demands. They are the beginning of a conversation.

We are asking the people and agencies responsible for emergency management, public lands, watershed recovery, transportation access, and disaster mitigation to help us understand what options may exist for Garland Mineral Springs.

Who We Are Contacting

As part of this first step, we have prepared letters to the following offices and agencies:

• Snohomish County Department of Emergency Management
• U.S. Forest Service, Skykomish Ranger District
• USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service
• Washington Emergency Management Division
• Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest Supervisor
• Snohomish County Councilmember Sam Low
• Washington State Senator Keith Wagoner
• Washington State Representative Sam Low
• Washington State Representative Carolyn Eslick
• U.S. Representative Suzan DelBene
• U.S. Senator Patty Murray
• U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell

Each letter tells a similar story from a slightly different angle. Some focus on emergency management. Some focus on watershed stabilization. Some focus on Forest Service roads, bridges, and access. Others ask elected officials to help keep Garland visible as recovery planning moves forward.

Together, these letters represent the first public step in asking for help.

What We Are Asking For

Our requests are practical and focused. We are asking for:

• Guidance on disaster recovery and hazard mitigation programs;
• Evaluation of ongoing erosion and river channel migration;
• Information about watershed stabilization and emergency access options;
• Coordination among county, state, and federal agencies;
• Help identifying programs that may apply to private landowners affected by flood damage;
• Support for protecting the geothermal mineral springs and historic character of Garland;
• Assistance keeping the upper North Fork Skykomish Valley visible as recovery planning continues.

We understand that recovery is complicated. We also understand that many communities, roads, bridges, rivers, and public lands were affected by the same flood events. Garland is one part of a much larger watershed story.

But Garland is also unique.

It is a historic mineral springs property. It is a family-held place with deep roots in the Index-Galena region. It contains geothermal springs that have been known since the late nineteenth century. It sits in a landscape shaped by public lands, mountain roads, rivers, forests, and generations of recreation in the North Cascades.

The Documents We Are Sharing

Along with each letter, we are including two supporting documents:

• Garland Mineral Springs Property Summary — a short overview of Garland’s history, location, mineral springs, ownership, and current concerns.
• Garland Mineral Springs Flood Damage Timeline — a summary of the 2025 flood event, infrastructure impacts, river migration, cabin loss, erosion, and ongoing threats to the springs and geothermal wells.

These documents are meant to help officials quickly understand what Garland was, what happened, and why the situation remains urgent.

This Is the Beginning of the Story

This blog post opens a new series about our effort to restore, preserve, and protect Garland Mineral Springs.

We do not yet know what help will be available. We do not know which programs may apply. We do not know whether agencies will be able to assist with site evaluation, erosion mitigation, access planning, or long-term watershed recovery.

But we do know this: doing nothing is not an option.

If the river continues to move unchecked, the mineral springs that gave Garland its name could be permanently altered or lost. If access continues to deteriorate, the ability to document, preserve, or restore the property becomes even more uncertain. If the story is not told, Garland may simply disappear from public awareness.

That is why we are writing.

We are writing to ask for help. We are writing to document the damage. We are writing to invite coordination. We are writing to make sure Garland is not forgotten.

Follow the Restore Garland Campaign

Over the coming months, we will share updates as letters are sent, responses are received, documents are prepared, and the next steps become clearer.

This journey will include public agencies, elected officials, family members, historians, environmental professionals, and anyone who believes that places like Garland Mineral Springs are worth remembering.

Garland has survived floods, fire, changing roads, changing times, and decades of uncertainty. Now we are asking whether it can survive one more chapter. And we are inviting you to follow that journey with us. —Stephen